FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ACS News Service Weekly PressPac: November 04, 2009
New evidence supports 19th Century idea on formation of oil and gas
- Energy & Fuels
Scientists in Washington, D.C. are reporting laboratory evidence supporting the possibility that some of Earth鈥檚 oil and natural gas may have formed in a way much different than the traditional process described in science textbooks.
Their study is scheduled for Nov./Dec. issue of ACS鈥� Energy & Fuels, a bi-monthly publication: . Anurag Sharma and colleagues note that the traditional process involves biology. Prehistoric plants died and changed into oil and gas while sandwiched between layers of rock in the hot, high-pressure environment deep below Earth鈥檚 surface. Some scientists, however, believe that oil and gas originated in other ways, including chemical reactions between carbon dioxide and hydrogen below Earth鈥� surface.
The new study describes a test of that idea, which dates to at least 1877 and famous Russian chemist Dimitri Mendeelev. They combined ingredients for this so-called abiotic synthesis of methane, the main ingredient in natural gas, in a diamond-anvil cell and monitored in-situ the progress of the reaction. The diamond anvils can generate high pressures and temperatures similar to those that occur deep below Earth鈥檚 surface and allow for in-situ optical spectroscopy at the extreme environments. The results 鈥渟trongly suggest鈥� that some methane could form strictly from chemical reactions in a variety of chemical environments. This study further highlights the role of reaction pathways and fluid immiscibility in the extent of hydrocarbon formation at extreme conditions simulating deep subsurface.
Contact
Science Inquiries: Michael Woods, Editor, 202-872-6293
General Inquiries: Michael Bernstein, 202-872-6042

deep beneath the Earth. Scientists are
reporting new evidence that oil may
have originated from processes other
that the decay of prehistoric plants.
Credit: Wikimedia Commons
(High-resolution version)