中国365bet中文官网

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Sunday, March 21, 11:40 a.m., Eastern Time

A potential new energy source so controversial that people once regarded it as junk science is moving closer to acceptance by the mainstream scientific community. That鈥檚 the conclusion of the organizer of one of the largest scientific sessions on the topic 鈥� 鈥渃old fusion鈥� 鈥� being held here for the next two days in the Moscone Center during the 239th National Meeting of the American Chemical 中国365bet中文官网 (ACS).

The presentations describe invention of an inexpensive new measuring device that could enable more labs to begin cold fusion research; indications that cold fusion may occur naturally in certain bacteria; progress toward a battery based on cold fusion; and a range of other topics. Marwan noted that many of the presentations suggest that cold fusion is real, with a potential to contribute to energy supplies in the 21st Century.

The term 鈥渃old fusion鈥� originated in 1989 when Martin Fleishmann and Stanley Pons claimed achieving nuclear fusion at room temperature with a simple, inexpensive tabletop device. That claim fomented an international sensation because nuclear fusion holds potential for providing the world with a virtually limitless new source of energy. Fuel for fusion comes from ordinary seawater, and estimates indicate that 1 gallon of seawater packs the energy equivalent of 16 gallons of gasoline at 100% efficiency for energy production.

Science Inquiries: Michael Woods, Editor, 202-872-6293
General Inquiries: Michael Bernstein, 202-872-6042